1660 L Street NW
Suite 450
Washington, D.C. 20036
Attn: Vicki Saporta
October 13, 2013
Ms. Saporta:
My role as a pro-life advocate requires me to make contact with some pretty despicable people and organizations. Your National Abortion Federation is one of them. The concept of openly campaigning for the unrestricted killing of our unborn children is something that is unthinkable to me. We were all unborn children at some stage in our lives and were totally dependent on the love, kindness, and mercy of others to simply be born. Ms. Saporta, the scientific evidence that unborn children are living human beings from the moment of conception is incontrovertible. Their beating hearts are detectable within 21 days of conception.
The NAF, Planned Parenthood, and NARAL, among others, are constantly touting abortion as a woman’s right. While it is legal for a woman to choose to have her unborn child killed in most states, it is not a right. And just because it’s legal it is not moral. I believe so strongly in what I am doing on behalf of our unborn children that I do it for free. Do you believe so strongly in your mission to insure that children can be killed that you would do it for free?
Ms. Saporta, can you honestly deny that every child killed today in America’s abortion mills were living human beings before they were ripped from their mothers’ wombs? You can’t kill anything or anyone that isn’t already alive. In your sick minds, if you don’t kill it before it grows; it will become a post-birth child, at which point it becomes a bit more cumbersome to dispose of. Your website refers to a woman’s choice to have her unborn child killed as a reproductive health care choice that is often in the best interests of the mother. What about the best interests of the child? Instead of calling abortion what it is, killing a baby, you call it terminating a pregnancy. Terminating a pregnancy sounds so much better than killing a living human being doesn’t it?
Ms. Saporta, tact isn’t one of my strong points so I’ll just say it. Your organization and everyone in America’s abortion industry seem to be suffering from an acute case of cranial-rectal-insertion. With that in mind, I beg to differ with the following statement found on your website: “Abortion is one of the safest medical procedures provided in the United States and Canada today.” Abortion results in the death of a human being virtually every time it is performed, and is certainly not safe. Abortion often results in not only the death of an innocent child, but the mother as well. Abortion has resulted in the deaths of 56,000,000 children in America since 1973. Can you think of another medical procedure, either safe or unsafe, that has intentionally killed millions of human beings over the last 40 years?
You and your ilk can lie to yourselves and deny the obvious truth that you are facilitators and enablers for the killing of innocent children. You can also lie to yourselves and try to deny that you will ultimately be held accountable for your actions.
All my letters are published on my pro-life blog at www.prolifepoppop.com. Should you choose to reply, I’ll publish it, unedited.
Pro Life Pop Pop 
Reblogged this on Pro Life Pop Pop and commented:
A couple years ago I made my first contact with Vicki Saporta, the head of the National Abortion Federation (NAF). I’m amazed at all the parasites and hangers on that fight for their piece of the financial pie that exists in the wake of the death and destruction that Planned Parenthood inflicts on America’s unborn children. When I wrote this letter 2 years ago, NAF was promoting abortion as a safe medical procedure. Safe for who? Certainly not the unborn child. They’re still out there, advocating for the legal murder of innocent children.
Try to imagine going to work every day to promote the killing of innocent children. That’s what Ms. Saporta and everyone on her staff does. I’ll continue to work every day to put Ms. Saporta and her staffout of a job.